MX alongside your GIS.
Enterprise GIS holds your authoritative spatial data — assets, networks, parcels, basemaps. MX:Spatial uses that data inside operational workflows, and contributes operational geometry back. Spatial reasoning, not just spatial display.
↳ MX complements. It rarely replaces.
Where GIS ends and MX begins.
We do not attack the platforms our customers already depend on. We describe what each does well, where each tends to struggle, and what MX adds when it joins the architecture.
Who maintains your map.
Most of what MX:Spatial draws, a well-run GIS stack can draw too. The honest difference is who does the work. In a GIS stack, each team's map is usually built and kept running by GIS specialists. In MX, the team that uses the map can look after it themselves — and your GIS team stays the authority on the data underneath.
Common integration pattern
MX:Spatial consumes authoritative layers from your GIS, generates operational geometry, and publishes operational features back where they belong.
GIS is the authority on space. MX is the authority on operations. Together, they turn spatial data into operational decisions — and operational activity back into intelligence the GIS can hold.
MX alongside the rest of the stack.
Most operations run all three. The same principle applies in each case: the system of record keeps its record, and MX puts it to work.
MX alongside ERP
ERPs are the system of record for money, contracts, vendors, employees, and inventory.
Open →MX alongside EAM
EAM platforms manage your asset register, maintenance plans, and asset lifecycle.
Open →The MX platform
The data model, permissions and audit trail that every comparison above rests on.
Open →Bring your architecture.
We will work through it with you.
MX sits between your enterprise systems and your field. The right integration model is specific to your environment — let us discuss it.